The lengthy appeal document lists seven major issues:
- Obvious errors in the application of law and the crime. (The lower courts had settled with a minor "causing disturbance" charge while the attackers had clearly intended to kill or at least causing major injuries.)
- New evidences prove that previous court-recognized facts are in error. (The lower courts had accepted a hospital statement that Fang Xuanchang only suffered minor injuries while the involved doctor told a newspaper that Fang Xuanchang had lost a large amount blood and showing signs of shock and dizziness.)
- The lower courts made mistakes in recognizing key facts, missed important leads in the case, and confused a few facts.
- There are significant discrepancies in the motives of the defendant.
- The sentences given by the lower courts are too light for the crimes involved.
- On their appeal, the Intermediate Court did not factually record evidences provided by the prosecutors.
- The original court procedure was seriously fraud.
By the original sentence, Dr. Xiao Chuanguo is due to be released at the present time.
No comments:
Post a Comment